Sep 26, 2018

Supreme Court's verdict on the basis of: Kapil Sibal said - This big victory, if needed and then go to court ?

Congress leader Kapil Sibal said after the Supreme Court's verdict on the basis that we have been saying beforehand that the Aadhaar Bill has not been brought to the Rajya Sabha but has been brought here. ?


Congress leader Kapil Sibal said after the Supreme Court's verdict on the basis that we have been saying beforehand that the Aadhaar Bill has not been brought to the Rajya Sabha but has been brought here. This Aadhar card was not the basis of the official rights card and the private companies' rights Act, which was rejected by the Supreme Court. He said that private companies have private information of millions of people. It will be misused. This is unconstitutional. Now the Supreme Court has accepted our case. Section 57 has been termed as unconstitutional by the court. This is a big victory, because in the future the government can not be judged. Kapil Sibal said that the Speaker of the Lok Sabha will be able to hear a bill if money bill is billed. If the government wants to amend, we will go back to the Supreme Court. We are with Justice Chandrachud. This is not a money bill.

Kapil Sibal said that the court has categorically corrected this law in the light of the poor people, but when the amendment, we will go to the Supreme Court again and demand the hearing for the 7 Judge Benches. It is not clear if the working people whose biometric details have been erased, what will the government do for them? We will study the decisions. If necessary, we will again go to court for this. The court also said that it can not keep up to 6 months of data. It is not clear how it will be eliminated. Sibal said that now there will be amendment in the Data Protection Law. Therefore, we want this to be discussed in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. If the base is dropped, then the marginalized people can not get anything. That's why the court is the right decision. We will put pressure on the government for amendment.


No comments: