Oct 30, 2018

Reliance Jio average download speed doubled in January to 17 mbps: Trai

The mobile broadband speed data published by Trai shows download speed on Reliance Jio reached 17.42 mbps in January from 8.34 mbps at the end of December

Reliance Jio average download speed doubled in January to 17 mbps Trai

The average peak download speed on Reliance Jio network more than doubled to 17.42 megabit per second (Mbps) at the end of January, according to data by telecom regulator Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai).

The monthly average mobile broadband speed published by the Trai showed that the download speed on Reliance Jio network reached 17.42 Mbps in January from 8.34 mbps at the end of December.
At this speed, a user can download a movie in less than three minutes. In the second place was Idea at 8.53 Mbps, up from 6.6 Mbps at the end of December. The download speed on Airtel network dropped slightly to 8.15 Mbps compared to 8.42 Mbps in the previous month.

Among other networks, download speed on Vodafone and BSNL also dipped marginally to 6.13 Mbps and 2.89 Mbps from 6.8 Mbps and 3.16 Mbps, respectively. The data showed an average download speed of 2.3 Mbps on Tata Docomo network.

Average download speeds of other networks were not available. Trai collects and computes the speed of mobile data from subscribers across the country with the help of My Speed application on real time basis.

Google is hosting a global contest to develop AI that’s beneficial for humanity

he company is pledging up to $25 million to groups that want to use AI to solve big problems

Google is hosting a global contest to develop AI that’s beneficial for humanity

Some of the biggest hurdles in the field of artificial intelligence are preventing such software from developing the same intrinsic faults and biases as its human creators and using AI to solve social issues instead of simply automating tasks. Now, Google, one of the world’s leading organizations developing AI software today, is launching a global competition to help spur the development of applications and research that have positive impacts on the field and society at large.

The competition, called the AI Impact Challenge, was announced today at an event called AI for Social Good held at the company’s Sunnyvale, California office, and it’s being overseen and managed by the company’s Google.org charitable arm. Google is positioning it as a way to integrate nonprofits, universities, and other organizations not within the corporate and profit-driven world of Silicon Valley into the future-looking development of AI research and applications. The company says it will award up to $25 million to a number of grantees to “help transform the best ideas into action.” As part of the contest, Google will offer cloud resources for the projects, and it is opening applications starting today. Accepted grantees will be announced at next year’s Google I/O developer conference.
Top of mind for Google with this initiative is using AI to solve problems in areas like environmental science, health care, and wildlife conservation. Google says AI is already used to help pin down the location of whales by tracking and identifying whale sounds, which can then be used to help protect from environmental and wildlife threats. The company says AI can also be used to predict floods and also to identify areas of forest that are especially susceptible to wildfires.

Another big area for Google is eliminating biases in AI software that could replicate the blind spots and prejudices of human beings. One notable and recent example was Google admitting in January that it couldn’t find a solution to fix its photo-tagging algorithm from identifying black people in photos as gorillas, initially a product of a largely white and Asian workforce not able to foresee how its image recognition software could make such fundamental mistakes. (Google’s workforce is only 2.5 per cent black.) Instead of figure out a solution, Google simply removed the ability to search for certain primates on Google Photos. It’s those kinds of problems — the ones Google says it has trouble foreseeing and needs help solving — that the company hopes its contest can try and address.

The competition, alongside Google’s new AI for Social Good program, follows a public pledge published in early June, in which the company said it would never develop AI weaponry and that its AI research and product development would be guided by a set of ethical principles. As part of those principles, Google said it would not work on AI surveillance projects that violate “internationally accepted norms,” and that its research would follow “widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.” The company also said its AI research would primarily focus on projects that are “socially beneficial.”
In recent months, many of technology’s biggest players, Google included, have grappled with the ethics of developing technology and products that may be used by the military, or that could contribute to the development of surveillance states in the US and abroad. Many of these technologies, like facial and image recognition, involve sophisticated uses of AI. Google, in particular, has found itself embroiled by controversies around its participation with a US Department of Defense drone initiative called Project Maven, and with its secret plans to launch a search and algorithmic news product for the Chinese market.

After severe internal backlash, external criticism, and employee resignations, Google agreed to pull back from its work with Project Maven following the fulfilment of its contract. Yet Google has said it’s still actively exploring a product for the Chinese market, despite concerns it could be used to surveil Chinese citizens and tie their offline activities to their online behaviour. Google has also said it still plans to work with the military, and its controversial Google Duplex service, which uses AI to mimic a human and make calls on a user’s behalf, will begin rolling out on Pixel devices next month.

Jeff Dean, the head of the company’s Google Brain AI division and a senior research fellow, says the AI Impact Challenge is not really a reaction to the company’s more recent controversies around military and surveillance-related work. “This has been in the works for quite some time. We’ve been doing work in the search space that is socially beneficial and not directly related to commercial applications,” he told a group of reporters after the event. “It’s really important for us to show what the potential for AI and machine learning can be, and to lead by example.”

Micromax Bharat 5 Infinity Edition, Bharat 4 Diwali Edition With Android Oreo (Go edition) Launched in India: Price, Specifications

Micromax Bharat 5 Infinity Edition, Bharat 4 Diwali Edition With Android Oreo (Go edition) Launched in India Price, Specifications

Micromax has added two new smartphones -
Bharat 5 Infinity Edition and Bharat 4 Diwali Edition -
in its budget smartphone lineup. Ahead of the festive season,
the company has launched the two handsets running Android Oreo
(Go edition) out-of-the-box. While the Bharat 5 Infinity
Edition is already available for sale via offline stores,
the Bharat 4 Infinity Edition will be available from November 3.
Android Oreo (Go edition) aka Android Go is a trimmed down version
of Android Oreo aimed at low-cost smartphones. It essentially optimises
the latest release of Android to run smoothly on entry-level devices,
provides a rebuilt set of Google apps that use less memory, storage space,
and mobile data and features the entire catalogue of Google Play highlighting
apps specifically designed for entry-level users
Micromax Bharat 5 Infinity Edition, Micromax Bharat 4 Diwali Edition price in India, offers
The price in India of the Micromax Bharat 5 Infinity Edition has been set at Rs. 5,899.
The Micromax Bharat 4 Diwali Edition, on the other hand, costs Rs. 4,249.
Both the smartphones will be available for sale via brick and mortar stores.
While the Bharat 5 is available in retail stores across India, the Bharat
4 will be available from November
3.As part of the launch offer, Micromax has partnered with Jio to give 25GB of
additional data to users. Customer will get 5GB additional data benefits on a
recharge of Rs. 198/ Rs. 299 for a maximum of 5 recharges. Notably, the offer
is applicable on Micromax GO Devices and Micromax Bharat 5.Micromax Bharat 5 Infinity Edition
specifications The dual-SIM Micromax Bharat 5 Infinity Edition runs Android Oreo (Go edition).
It sports a 18:9 Full Vision display. Micromax has not specified which processor
powers the smartphone. However, it does say that the handset comes with 1GB of RAM.
 In terms of optics, the smartphone bears a 5-megapixel camera at the back and a
5-megapixel selfie camera.The Micromax Bharat 5 Infinity Edition comes with 16GB of inbuilt storage,
Micromax Bharat 5 Infinity Edition, Bharat 4 Diwali Edition With Android Oreo (Go edition) Launched in India Price, Specifications

expandable via microSD card (up to 64GB). It has Face Unlock as well as a fingerprint sensor.
It also comes with dual VoLTE and OTG support. The company has packed a 5,000mAh battery in
the smartphone.Micromax Bharat 4 Diwali Edition specifications
The Micromax Bharat 4 Diwali Edition also runs Android Oreo (Go edition).
The smartphone sports a 5-inch display. It comes with 1GB of RAM as well.
In the camera department, the handset features a 5-megapixel sensor at the
back with flash and a 2-megapixel sensor at the front with flash.

The smartphone is equipped with 8GB of inbuilt storage, expandable
via microSD card (up to 32GB). It has a non-hybrid SIM slot but supports 4G VoLTE.
The Micromax Bharat 4 Diwali Edition is fuelled by a 2,000mAh battery.

iOS 12.1 supports dual-SIM, group FaceTime, and stops ‘fixing’ selfies


iOS 12.1 supports dual-SIM, group FaceTime, and stops ‘fixing’ selfies

Apple just announced that it will be rolling out its iOS 12.1 update, for the iPhone and the iPad,
starting today. The update will bring important features like group FaceTime, dual-SIM support for
the new iPhones, over 70 emojis, and a fix for over-smooth selfies.
The company originally announced the group Facetime feature, supporting up to 32 people,
at its developer conference WWDC, back in June. In its latest update, the company has added more
features to Facetime. During a group call, Facetime will automatically detect the active participant
and bring them to the forefront.One can tap a specific person’s tile and bring them to center as well.
Additionally, one can start a group Facetime call directly from messages app. Apple also noted that
all Facetime calls are protected by end-to-end encryption.

The dual-sim compatibility was one of the most sought-after
features of the new iPhones. Now with the iOS 12.1 update,
the software has been upgraded to support eSIM functionality.
 This will enable consumers to use two sims without using a
physical second sim. You can verify if your carrier supports
eSIM through this list.

Apple also introduced depth control for portrait photos for
the new iPhones, at the launch. Now, with the new update,
users will be able to change the depth of field via a slider
in the live preview as well. Earlier, it was possible to control
 the depth of field only post-capture.

Emoji lovers can also rejoice as the Cupertino company is
introducing 70 emojis through this update including a freezing face,
a pleading face, lettuce, cupcakes, and an infinity symbol.

The company earlier confirmed to The Verge that it will fix
the over-smoothing effect in selfies deemed as ‘Beautygate’
by many. It said that it will tweak the algorithm for SmartHDR
to make the selfies look more natural.
You can check out the full set of features here.
Apple is expected to announce new iPad Pros and a
new MacBook Air, later today.  You can find all the
coverage about that on Plugged.

Google Pixel 3 XL bug adds side notch to the display, fix coming soon

The latest Google Pixel 3 XL bug adds a notch to the right side of the display. The problem appears if a user makes the switch to landscape mode and back.

Google Pixel 3 XL bug adds side notch to the display, fix coming soon


Google Pixel 3 XL has encountered a bug that adds a second notch, as reported by UrAvgConsumer, and other Twitter and Reddit users. As per these reports, the Pixel 3 XL bug introduces a virtual bug on the right side, that appears on the top half. The Google flagship holds a notch over its display, that houses the phone’s dual cameras, as well as some sensors.
The problem was first reported by UrAvgConsumer on October 25, with a tweet that reads “So my Pixel randomly grew another notch today.” Other users made similar complaints, and in each case, the second ‘virtual’ notch seems to appear over the same region of the display. The problem has been detected after a user switches to landscape mode, and then attempts to revert back. Some users also claimed that the bug could be fixed by restarting the phone, or by altering the phone’s developer settings.
Reports from The Verge and AndroidPolice have also confirmed the presence of this Pixel 3 XL bug. When contacted by the AndroidPolice, Google responded by confirming its knowledge of the bug, and said it is working on a software update for the same.
Pixel 3 series has been involved in a spate of bugs since its launch. Most recently, the Google phones faced a photo saving bug, that would not save images shot in HDR mode. As per user reports, the bug occurs if a user takes an HDR image from the Google camera app, and switches to another app immediately after tapping on the ‘Save image’ option. Google has promised a fix for it in the weeks to come.

Korean Civil Society Groups Protest Seoul Peace Prize for Modi, Call It a 'Disgrace

Citing the 2002 killings in Gujarat, the groups said the choice of Modi was akin to selecting Chun Doo-hwan, South Korea's military ruler in the 1980s, on whose watch hundreds of civilians were massacred at Gwangju.

Korean Civil Society Groups Protest Seoul Peace Prize for Modi, Call It a 'Disgrace

Several Korean volunteer groups recently organised protests and called upon the Seoul Peace Prize committee to retract the conferment of the annual prize on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The Seoul Peace Prize award,  announced on October 24, has been awarded annually since 1990. Previous awardees include German chancellor Angela Merkel, UN secretary general Kofi Annan and international charities like Oxfam and Doctors Without Borders.
Modi was conferred the award for “fostering economic growth in the world’s fastest growing large economy and furthering the development of democracy through anti-corruption and social integration efforts”. The other achievements listed including demonetisation, anti-corruption, reducing wealth inequality through ‘Modinomics’, ‘Modi Doctrine’ and ‘Act East policy’.
A press release from the Indian Ministry of External Affairs claimed the award committee described Modi as “the perfect candidate for the 2018 Seoul Peace Prize”.

The announcement of the award was immediately cited by Modi and the ruling BJP as a major accomplishment:
On Sunday, the Korean news agency, Yonhap, reported that Korean civil society groups held a press conference on October 26 to assert that giving Modi the award was akin to “Chun Doo-hwan receiving a peace prize.
A former army general and dictator, Chun was South Korea’s president from 1980 to 1988. He was sentenced to death in 1996 for the Gwangju massacre, in which over 600 civilian protestors are believed to have been killed by his martial law government.
In a report, Korea Herald said that 26 NGOs held a joint protest and press conference. “Giving Mr. Modi this prize for ‘Modinomics’ is almost equivalent to giving Mr. Chun Doo-hwan a peace prize for Korea’s economic development in the 1980s and the hosting of the 1988 Seoul Olympic Games,” the protesters said. They added “Modi’s win is also a disgrace to the past laureates of this prestigious award”.
The Korean NGOs asserted that the Indian prime minister “does not deserve the honour as he has a history of being complicit in violence against Muslims in India”.
“Human rights groups in Korea say Narendra Modi deliberately allowed anti-Muslim riots in India that killed more than 1,000 people in 2002,” said the Korea Herald report.

Modi was chief minister of Gujarat in 2002 when right wing groups took part in attacks on the state’s Muslims. The Supreme Court of India described Modi as a “modern day Nero” who fiddled while his state burned and did little to either stop the violence promptly or prosecute those who were involved.

Pakistan's bumper $6-billion bailout from Saudi Arabia raises major questions about what Riyadh wants in return

Pakistan's bumper $6-billion bailout from Saudi Arabia raises major questions about what Riyadh wants in return

Timing is everything in politics, both domestic and international. If the CBI bubble burst at the most inopportune moment for Prime Minister Narendra Modi — at a time when five Indian states are going to Assembly polls whose outcome will have a critical bearing on the 2019 General Election, the Jamal Khashoggi affair could not have come at a more opportune moment for Pakistan's new government led by Prime Minister Imran Khan. It may be recalled that Islamabad is struggling with a severe balance of payment crisis.
Several persons and countries have been affected by Khashoggi's cold-blooded murder: Imran is one such person, and Pakistan is one such country. Before Khashoggi's messy murder weakened Saudi Arabia, the Pakistani prime minister went on his maiden foreign visit to Riyadh in September. There was speculation that the Saudis would accept his request for help in meeting a financial crisis at home, but nothing of substance materialised. However, within as a few weeks, the circumstances for the Saudi regime changed dramatically.
Khashoggi, a Saudi citizen who was also an American resident and a Washington Post columnist, had recently fallen out with the Saudi establishment following expressing dissent against the policies being pursued by the Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman, the Kingdom's de facto ruler. A few weeks ago, Khashoggi disappeared in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul and did not reemerge from the building.
As international pressure mounted, Riyadh was forced to confirm that Khashoggi was murdered inside the consulate. To the utter surprise, discomfort and embarrassment of the Saudi royal family, the Khashoggi saga has since continued to unravel. Hundreds of millions of dollars spent by the Saudi royal on public relations seem to have gone down the drain; the monarchy is yet to learn how to protect its global reputation. Even Republican senators who once supported the Saudis, have been left revolted by the atrocity. Although few expect King Salman to sideline his favourite son anytime soon, he is likely to be relieved of some of the portfolios. In response to the killing, many political leaders, business executives, and media outlets cancelled their trips to Saudi Arabia to attend the economic forum, also known as "Davos in the Desert".
Imran was also scheduled to visit Riyadh for the investment conference in what would be his second visit in a month as he is desperately seeking financial aid from 'friendly' countries to minimise what are sure to be agonisingly stern conditions placed by the IMF on Pakistan as part of the bailout. The bigger the bailout from the IMF, the greater the impact on the political survivability of the PTI and Imran. But then the Khashoggi episode took place and the international reaction stunned the Saudis. Imran and his group of advisors immediately sensed the importance of undertaking a trip to Riyadh as the international heavyweights turned their backs on Saudi Arabia. And the outcome was $6 billion, which will finance half of Pakistan's current needs of $12 billion.
Imran was able to secure the bailout deal when Pakistan needed it most, and at a time, when none of its friends were really keen to provide such assistance. But, the prime minister is not unaware of the implications of this deal. The international leaders who did not visit Riyadh cited principles that can be considered dear to any democratic nation: Rule of law and freedom of expression. He may sidestep the issue of moral liability on the principle of realpolitik. In other words, much that is immoral in general, is permitted when a country's economic survival is at stake. All approaches to political morality conceived without practical
applications in mind are generally troubled.
Imran's advocates are already celebrating his "tactically smart participation" in the Saudi investment conference. The surprise infusion of financial liquidity could mean a fantastic boost for the PTI government and the Pakistani economy. But he lost an historic opportunity to subject Pakistan to "shock therapy" which nonetheless entail huge political risks and economic uncertainty. But what about the questions being asked about Riyadh's expectations from Islamabad? Will it be involvement in war in Yemen, which has been destroyed by two years of the Saudi-UAE joint bombing campaign against the Shia Houthi militia?
The Yemen conflict is rightly viewed as part of the regional geopolitical rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia along with its regional allies. Has Pakistan been asked to get involved in the Yemen crisis? This is what the PTI’s spin doctors seem to suggest. But when Pakistan finds it so incapable to help resolve the Afghan conflict where it has more leverage with one of the protagonists, it is anybody’s guess what role Islamabad is going to play in the resolution of the Yemen crisis. The only role the Saudis may find appropriate for Pakistan is its military
strength. So, the hidden cost of the Saudi bailout, in all likelihood, is the despatch of Pakistani troops to Saudi Arabia. All Pakistani political parties, including the ruling PTI, have been staunchly against sending of Pakistani troops into the war in Yemen.
Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan has already claimed that the Saudis had planned Khashoggi’s assassination. Since Pakistan enjoys very close relations with Turkey, Imran cannot afford to antagonise Erdogan with the celebration of his mercenary bailout deal with Riyadh. He has sent Pakistani president Arif Alvi to Turkey on his first official visit. Although the ostensible reason for Alvi's visit is to attend the opening ceremony of Istanbul’s new airport, he will be expected to explain the rationale behind Pakistan-Saudi deal.
Ethical and moral considerations are alien to Pakistani policymakers whose singular role in international politics is to oppose India.
Besides the bailout deal, the lifting of the ban on the Jamaat-ud Dawa (JuD) and Falah-i-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF), offshoots of the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), explains the nature of opaque and irrational decision-making in Pakistan. These groups were outlawed in February via a presidential ordinance. Even though this move came ahead of what turned out to be a fateful Financial Action Task Force (FATF) meeting in Paris, it was a good decision to ban terror groups active in Pakistan that have been blacklisted by a UN Security Council committee on sanctions against terrorist groups. After the lapse of the presidential ordinance, they are no longer proscribed groups in Pakistan.
Pakistan's journey to democracy has been quite haphazard and erratic. Only the last two democratically-elected governments were given a chance to complete a five-year term. That despite the fact that elected governments also failed to deliver on the governance front and continued with the same economic and foreign policies of military dictatorships that ruined Pakistan.
Former Pakistani Senator Farhatullah Babar brilliantly summed up the Saudi deal when he tweeted that "Remember, trade-offs that are mercenary in character intrinsically unsustainable, will haunt Pakistan for long." Therefore, it remains an open question as to whose vulnerabilities will be exploited by whom. But the charge that Pakistan is ultimately dependent on foreign aid and external loans cannot be brushed aside. Since $6 billion are not sufficient, Imran will visit China in the first week of November in an effort to obtain fresh loans to prop up the economy.
The bailouts sought by Pakistan will further encourage and normalise economic mismanagement and strategic myopia among Pakistan’s ruling circles. No regime has shown the guts to implement much-needed reforms in governing practices and strategic vision which can make Pakistan a viable, functioning political entity. As long as the military remains the dominant influence on policy, Pakistan's economic decline cannot be arrested. Imran can make "Naya Pakistan" only when anti-India geopolitics is no longer the overriding preoccupation of the Pakistani State.
Besides anti-Indianism and Islamic fundamentalism, opportunism also serves as a backbone of the Pakistani State. The country's ruling elite has perfected the art of taking advantage of another country's vulnerabilities. And after Khashoggi's assassination, the Saudi regime is experiencing one of the most vulnerable moments in its entire lifespan.government is understood to be exploring options for the ..

Pakistan, China to launch CPEC bus service this week to boost ‘friendship’ – 5 points

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor is a USD 50 billion project that connects China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region with Pakistan's Gwadar Port located strategically on the Arabian Sea.

Pakistan, China to launch CPEC bus service this week to boost ‘friendship’ – 5 points

Taking their ‘friendship’ forward, China and Pakistan are all set to launch a bus service from next month, reports said. The bus service is being started from November 03 as part of the flagship China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) which is part of the broader Belt and Road Initiative, which India has refused to join over territorial concerns. The aim of the luxurious bus service is to facilitate easier travel between the two neighbours, reports said.
To recall, the CPEC project was started in 2015 and has a total cost of USD 50 billion. It covers a network of roads, railways and energy projects and connects China's Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region with Pakistan's Gwadar Port located strategically on the Arabian Sea.

Pakistan-China CPEC bus service - five things to know:

  1. The Pakistan-China bus service will be run by a private transport company, North-South Transport Network, and officially start services on November 03. It will connect Pakistan’s Lahore and China’s Kashgar. State-run Radio Pakistan said the bus journey would be 30-hour-long and a one-way ticket would cost Rs 13,000. A return journey has been priced at Rs 23,000 and bookings are already underway.
  2. The aim of the bus service is to enhance friendly ties between Pakistan and China, Muhammad Anwar, CEO of the company that will run the service, said. A Pakistani would require a valid Chinese visa and other identity documents to undertake the journey.
  3. Officials said the two countries are for the first time launching a high-end bus service. It is to be noted that China and Pakistan already have a land route link for trade and travel purposes.
  4. The bus will ply four days a week and start from Lahore and Tashkurgan. From Lahore, the bus would ply on Saturday, Sunday, Monday and Tuesday. On the other hand, the departure from Tashkurgan would be on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday, Pakistani newspaper The News said.
  5. As per The News report, premium and luxurious buses would be used to offer a comfortable journey. “The en-route services will include breakfast, lunch, dinner refreshment, beverages, tea, and snacks. Fast Wi-Fi service would also be provided," the report added.

India, Qatar To Establish Joint Commission To Strengthen Their Relations

The decision was taken after External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj met Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim Bin Hamad Al-Thani and discussed ways to move forward on the roadmap set by the top leaders of the two countries.

India, Qatar To Establish Joint Commission To Strengthen Their Relations

India and Qatar Monday decided to set up a Joint Commission to strengthen their relations and regularly review all the bilateral matters, as well as regional and global issues of mutual interest.
The decision was taken after External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj met Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim Bin Hamad Al-Thani and discussed ways to move forward on the roadmap set by the top leaders of the two countries.
It is the first ever visit of Ms Swaraj to Doha.
The two sides have decided to establish the Joint Commission, according to a joint declaration issued after the talks.
The Joint Commission will be co-chaired by the Ministers of External Affairs and Foreign Affairs of the two countries or their representatives and may include in its membership representatives of the sectors concerned with the bilateral cooperation in both the countries, it said.
The Joint Commission will be tasked to strengthen the relations between the two countries particularly in the economic, commercial, cultural, scientific, technological, information technology and educational fields.
It will be responsible for following up the implementation of the agreements concluded between the two sides and finding suitable solutions for the resulting problems of the implementation thereof.
It will also be charged with facilitating the exchange of information and expertise and encouraging bilateral consultation in service of cooperation between the two countries.
The Commission will also hold a meeting at a time agreed by both countries alternately in each country and extraordinary session may be held at the consent of both the sides.
"The joint commission may, when necessary, form subordinate committees or permanent or temporary joint working groups to discharge specific tasks within their mandates," the statement said.
India and Qatar share millennia old historic multi-dimensional, relations.
The bilateral visit of the Emir of Qatar in March 2015 and Prime Minister of Qatar Abdullah bin Nasser bin Khalifa Al Thani to India in December 2016 and that of the visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Qatar in June 2016 have further boosted traditionally cordial and close ties between the two countries, the MEA said.
Qatar hosts about seven lakh Indians who form the largest expatriate community in the Gulf country. Qatar is a reliable energy partner, supplying more than 50 per cent of India's natural gas imports, it said.Swaraj's next leg of visit would be to Kuwait with which India has close and friendly bilateral relations.

Sacked Sri Lanka Minister Arjuna Ranatunga Arrested Over Shooting: Police

Police said earlier that in an altercation on Sunday, when Arjuna Ranatunga tried to enter his office, his security guard shot and killed one person and wounded two

Sacked Sri Lanka Minister Arjuna Ranatunga Arrested Over Shooting Police

Sri Lankan police on Monday arrested deposed oil minister Arjuna Ranatunga over a shooting that killed one person on the weekend, police spokesman said.
"Colombo Crime division arrested Ranatunga over the shooting incident and he will be produced to the court shortly," police spokesman Ruwan Gunasekera told Reuters.
President Maithripala Sirisena on Saturday declared that the cabinet had been dissolved with the appointment of a new prime minister a day earlier.
Since then, members of trade unions linked to the new prime minister, Mahinda Rajapaksa, have blocked ministers from the old cabinet from entering their ministries.
Police said earlier that in an altercation on Sunday, when Ranatunga tried to enter his office, his security guard shot and killed one person and wounded two.

PM Narendra Modi returns to Delhi after two-day Japan visit

India and Japan have also signed a Memorandum of Cooperation to promote bilateral partnership in Indian traditional medicinal systems such as Ayurveda and Yoga under the rubric of Health Care and Wellness.

PM Narendra Modi returns to Delhi after two-day Japan visit

 Prime Minister Narendra Modi early on Tuesday morning returned to New Delhi after concluding his two-day Japan visit. India and Japan signed six agreements after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe held talks in Tokyo on Monday. After the 13th bilateral summit, both the sides also made two key announcements on defence and development projects. In defence, it was agreed to establish a 22 dialogue mechanism between the Foreign Ministers and the Defence Ministers of the two countries to augment bilateral defence and strategic ties.
India and Japan also called upon Pakistan to "bring to justice the perpetrators of terrorist attacks, including those of November 2008 in Mumbai and January 2016 in Pathankot" in a joint statement delivered after bilateral talks on Monday.
During his visit, Prime Minister Modi also wished Japan luck for hosting the Olympics in 2020 in Tokyo, the G-20 summit in Osaka in 2019 and Rugby World Cup in 2019.
India and Japan have also signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) to promote bilateral partnership in Indian traditional medicinal systems such as Ayurveda and Yoga under the rubric of Health Care and Wellness. Prime Minister Modi also addressed an Indian Community Event during his visit.

Donald Trump declined India’s invitation for Republic Day event due to 'scheduling constraints': White House

US President would not be able to participate in India's Republic Day event next year due to scheduling constraints, White House has confirmed

Donald Trump declined India’s invitation for Republic Day event due to 'scheduling constraints' White House

The White House clarified on Monday that US President Donald Trump had to decline India’s invitation to participate as the Chief Guest at the Republic Day celebrations in New Delhi next year due to “scheduling constraints.” During their talks in Washington last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had invited President Trump for a bilateral visit to India.

In July, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders had stated that President Trump had received an invitation to India but that no decision had been taken then. When asked about Trump’s decision on the pending invitation by Modi, a White House spokesperson told news agency PTI over phone, “President Trump was honoured by Prime Minister Modi’s invitation for him to be Chief Guest of India’s Republic Day on January 26, 2019 but is unable to participate due to
Reportedly, the annual State of the Union (SOTU) address to both Houses of the US Congress by President Trump is expected to take place at around the same time when India celebrates its Republic Day. In the past, the SOTU address has usually taken place in the last week of January or first week of February. US President Donald Trump snubs India: Won't attend 70th Republic Day celebrations
Meanwhile, the WH spokesperson told PTI that President Trump was committed to deepening the India-US relationship and noted that both Trump and PM Modi shared a “strong personal rapport.” The spokesperson said, “The President enjoys a strong personal rapport with Prime Minister Modi developed through two meetings and several phone calls and remains committed to deepening the US-India strategic partnership. The President very much looks forward to meeting Prime Minister Modi again at the earliest opportunity.”
The two world leaders are scheduled to attend the G-20 Summit in Argentina on November 30 and December 1, where it is expected that the two would meet and discuss bilateral relationship.

Every year, on the occasion of India’s Republic Day on January 26, the government invites a Head of State to attend the celebrations as a chief guest. This year, leaders of 10 ASEAN countries had attended the R-Day event while in 2016, the then French president Francois Hollande had been the chief guest at the event. Former US President Barack Obama, who was then in power, had attended the event in 2015. 

Modi, Abe back ‘free Indo-Pacific’

Modi, Abe back ‘free Indo-Pacific’

Defence ties dominate summit talks 

India and Japan outlined a vision for strengthened bilateral relations at the 13th annual summit here on Monday.
Enhanced strategic and defence cooperation dominated the talks between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart, Shinzo Abe.
Japan’s formulation of a “free and open Indo-Pacific” received a central place in the vision statement issued at the end of the talks, with both sides stressing their “unwavering commitment to it.” The concept is usually seen as a response to China’s growing dominance in the region.
Speaking to the press after his talks with Mr. Abe, Mr. Modi said the India-Japan bilateral relationship was invested in upholding the rule of law and democratic values.

Tokyo talks stress democratic values

Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressed that ties with Japan were invested in upholding the rule of law and democratic values.
He was speaking at a press conference after a summit with his Japanese counterpart, Shinzo Abe.
These are the very catch phrases that underlie the new security architecture that Japan and the United States are trying to put in place to counter China. The vision statement specifically mentioned the willingness of both countries to “expand concrete cooperation with the U.S. and other partners”.

Freedom of navigation

It also referred to the necessity of ensuring the freedom of navigation and the importance of upholding the UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea), a set of conventions that China has been accused of flouting in the South China Sea.
Mr. Modi and his Japanese counterpart, Shinzo Abe, further announced the start of negotiations on an Acquisition and Cross-servicing Agreement, a logistics-sharing pact, that would allow Japanese ships to get fuel and servicing at Indian naval bases. Once signed, Japan’s Maritime Self-Defence Force will be able to secure access to Indian naval facilities in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, which are strategically located close to the western Malacca Straits, a choke point for much of Japan and China’s trade and fuel imports. A new Foreign and Defence Ministerial Dialogue, termed 2+2, was also announced to supplement an already formidable array of bilateral dialogue mechanisms that include the Annual Defence Ministerial Dialogue, Defence Policy Dialogue and the National Security Advisers Dialogue.
On the economic front, the two countries have agreed to a Bilateral Swap Arrangement that would allow their central banks to exchange local currencies for up to $75 billion. This is substantially more than the $30 billion currency swap arrangement announced between China and Japan.
Mr. Abe told the press that 57 Japanese companies had committed to investing 320 billion yen in India, which is expected to create at least 3,000 new jobs. Mr. Modi said that he was convinced that the 21st century could be an Asian century only with a strong India-Japan relationship at its core.

Amit Shah's Remark On Sabarimala Shows Democracy In Danger, Says Mayawati

In a statement, the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) chief said that Mr Shah's remarks showed "the democracy of the country is in danger".

Amit Shah's Remark On Sabarimala Shows Democracy In Danger, Says Mayawati

BSP president Mayawati Sunday condemned BJP chief Amit Shah's remarks on the Sabarimala verdict, saying the court should take cognisance of the "irresponsible and provocative statement".
In a statement, the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) chief said that Mr Shah's remarks showed "the democracy of the country is in danger".
Addressing a gathering in Kerala's Kannur on Saturday, Mr Shah listed court verdicts which have not been implemented, including on 'Jallikattu' (traditional bull taming sport of Tamil Nadu) and prohibiting loudspeakers in mosques, and said "impractical" directions should not be given by courts and they should pass orders that can be implemented.
"The statement of the ruling party president is condemnable and irresponsible. Court should take cognisance. It shows the democracy of the country is in danger. Autonomous institutions such as CBI, CVC, ED and RBI are facing crisis due to wrong perspective of the government and ego," Mayawati said.
"On this serious matter of Sabrimala temple, BJP leader's speech is provocative and an attempt to take political mileage in Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan polls," she said, terming it "unconstitutional and unparliamentary".
"If the BJP is not satisfied with the SC decision allowing women's entry into the temple, they should approach court and not create chaos on roads or threaten to dismiss elected government," Mayawati said, adding that the BJP wanted to divert attention of the people from core issues by raking up religious matters.
On September 28, the Supreme Court paved the way for entry of women of all ages into the Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala in Kerala.
A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, in its 4:1 verdict, said that banning the entry of women of menstrual age into the shrine is gender discrimination and the practice violates rights of Hindu women

Sikhs, Hindus were safe once: UP CM Yogi Adiyanath's eulogy to Hindu rule in Kashmir

UP CM Yogi Adityanath said Sikhs and Hindus were safe in J&K under the Hindu king's patronage. With the fall of Hindu kingdom, a debacle of Hindus started. We need to learn from history, he added.

Sikhs, Hindus were safe once UP CM Yogi Adiyanath's eulogy to Hindu rule in Kashmir

As BJP sharpens its Hindutva rhetoric ahead of the state assembly elections in five states, UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Monday (October 29) said suffering of Hindus in Jammu & Kashmir started after the fall of “Hindu Kingdom”. Reaching out to the Sikh community at BJP’s Sikh Samaghan event, Adityanath said, Sikhs were safe in the state under the protection of a Hindu king.
“Jab tak Kashmir mein Hindu raja tha Hindu aur Sikh surakshit the. Jab Hindu raja ka patan hua, Hinduon ka bhi patan hona shuru hogaya. Aaj wahan ki sthiti kya hai? Koi apne ko surakshit bol sakta hai? Nahi. Humein itihas se seekhna chahiye: UP CM Adityanath at BJP's Sikh Samagan,” said UP CM at the event.
In the past, many people including the Sikh community had to flee after the Hindu rule came to an end in the state. In a bid to broaden the party’s vote bank, Adityanath said his government will soon name institutions after Sikh Gurus such as Guru Nanakji who contributed to “nation-building”.
“I visited Patna Sahib when I visited Bihar. Our government has ordered a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe 1984 Sikh riots. Some people are trying to divide the country, we have to be careful or else an Afghanistan-like situation will follow,” he said.
Just yesterday, BJP MP Anurag Thakur and Rajasthan Minister of State (MoS) for Panchayat Raj Dhan Singh Rawat at different rallies used Hindutva to drum up support ahead of elections.
Thakur while speaking at the party’s Vijay Laksh 2019 event in Hyderabad said “whoever talks of Hindu rights will rule India”. He attacked the Congress leaders for taking a U-turn on its stance after alleging Hindu terror over Hindutva politics. “Those who spoke of Hindu terror for political appeasement now wear ‘janehu’ (a holy Hindu totem), and make temple runs – thereby vindicating the Hindutva stand,” he said.
Earlier, a Rajasthan Minister of State (MoS) for Panchayat Raj Dhan Singh Rawat in violation of election commission’s model code of conduct tried to wedge a divide in the fragile communal fabric of the state in a speech recently.
The minister in CM Vasundhara Raje government called upon Hindus to vote for the BJP since Muslims vote for Congress. Rawat on pretext of ‘protecting’ Hindus, incited the crowd to vote for BJP as “all” Muslims vote for Congress". 

Will Sue Rahul Gandhi For Defamation, Says Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister

Election in Madhya Pradesh: Shivraj Singh Chouhan accused Rahul Gandhi of making "patently false allegations" linked to the Vyapam scam and the Panama Papers.

Will Sue Rahul Gandhi For Defamation, Says Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister


Rahul Gandhi is likely to face a defamation suit for his comments on Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan as the campaign for the November state election grows bitter.
Mr Chouhan accused the Congress president of making "patently false allegations" linked to the Vyapam recruitment scam and the Panama Papers against him and his family.
At a public meeting on Monday, Rahul Gandhi repeated his allegations against the Chief Minister, accusing him of presiding over "rampant corruption
Without taking names, Mr Gandhi used Shivraj Singh Chouhan's nickname to target him: "Udhar Chowkidar, Idhar Mamaji. Mamaji ke jo bete hai, Panama Papers me unka naam nikalta hai. (On one side, you have the watchman, on the other side you have 'mamaji'. The name of the son of 'mamaji' figured in Panama Papers)," Mr Gandhi said.
He also alleged that the Chouhan government was involved in the Vyapam scam and in financial irregularities while organising Simhastha Kumbh in Ujjain in 2016
Shivraj Singh Chouhan

The BJP instantly rubbished the charges.
"Probably, Rahul, after visiting Mahakal Temple in Ujjain and after having 'prasad', got influenced by it and levelled these baseless allegations," said the party's Kailash Vijaywargiya.
State BJP spokesman Rajnish Agrawal also mocked Mr Gandhi and said: "As president of the Congress party, he (Rahul Gandhi) is committing a crime morally and legally. The party leadership will decide what action needed to be taken in the matter."
Madhya Pradesh will vote on November 28 for a new assembly. The Congress aims at defeating the ruling BJP, which has been in power in the state for 15 years

The 5 Pillars of Rahul Gandhi’s Platform Against BJP in Madhya Pradesh's Saffron Stronghold

Referring to a recent meeting with former servicemen, the Congress chief said they accused Modi of betraying them on the issue of One Rank, One Pension.
The 5 Pillars of Rahul Gandhi’s Platform Against BJP in Madhya Pradesh's Saffron Stronghold


 Congress chief Rahul Gandhi kept up his attack on the Narendra Modi government over the issues of corruption, demonetisation and Goods and Services Tax (GST) in poll-bound Madhya Pradesh on Monday, accusing the BJP of favouring industrialists over the disadvantaged sections of society.

Mounting pressure on the government for “helping loan defaulters flee”, Gandhi claimed that businessman Mehul Choksi, who is at the heart of the PNB fraud, transferred money to the bank account of finance minister Arun Jaitley’s daughter before fleeing the country.
Gandhi, who kicked off his two-day campaign from Malwa-Nimar region of Madhya Pradesh with a visit to Ujjain’s Mahakal Temple, said: “Choksi transferred lakhs of rupees in the bank account of Jaitley’s daughter and then fled with Rs 35,000 crore, only to be called Mehul Bhai by PM Narendra Modi.”

“If any cops like those present here helped a thief run away, they would be thrown in jail. But the finance minister hasn’t faced any action,” he alleged.

Accusing the BJP government of denying any waiver to distressed farmers, Gandhi said: “I don’t make false promises. Within 10 days of the Congress forming the government in MP, our CM will announce a waiver. If he fails to do so, we will find a replacement.”
Referring to a recent meeting with former servicemen, the Congress chief said they accused Modi of betraying them on the issue of One Rank, One Pension and “burning down Jammu and Kashmir”. “You boast about surgical strike. I want to ask what you did for those who carried out the surgical strike for you,” he said.

Later, addressing a tribal population in Jhabua, Gandhi said two types of countries were in the making of late — one for the billionaires and one for people like those in Jhabua, farmers, labourers and so on. We, Gandhi said, “don’t believe in differentiation so we have faith in a single flag, while they [BJP] have two flags. The RSS already has a second flag”.
Gandhi also spoke about the emotional bond the locals share with late prime ministers Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi, saying, “You people had a special place in your hearts for them as you knew they fought for your rights on ‘Jal, Jangal and Zameen’.”

“Like my father Rajiv Gandhi dreamt of education, health, employment and other amenities for you, I also think you should dream about all these things,” he added.

The Congress chief underlined the initiatives taken by his party for tribals such as MGNREGS and Right to Food, alleging that the first thing PM Modi did after coming to power was make attempts to quash the Land Acquisition Bill. “When Congress stalled his moves in Parliament, he got the bill quashed in BJP-ruled states, including MP.”
Gandhi emphasised on the contribution made by the tribals to the independence struggle, saying the tri-colour flying on the hillock nearby had sacrifices from every section, including the tribals, through their freedom fighters such as Birsa Munda.

“Once you vote Congress to power, you will feel it’s your government in rule after 15 years,” said Gandhi.

“I challenge if any tribal or any common man can manage to meet Modiji for 5 minutes in his office,” he said. “In five years, Prime Minister got clicked with presidents, business tycoons and others but he wasn’t seen in a picture with any poor man once,” he said.
The Congress chief’s visit is significant as the region has been a BJP citadel since the party won 56 of 66 seats from the area in the last election, while the grand old party holds only nine. An electoral turnaround in the region could mean return to power for the Congress.

Attacking Gandhi for his temple visits, BJP leaders Prabhat Jha, Kailash Vijayvargiya and Sambit Patra asked him if he knew his “gotra”. Vijayvargiya, meanwhile, said he would pray to Lord Shiva to give ‘wisdom’ to Gandhi.

Later in the evening, Gandhi held a roadshow in Indore.   

A Statue of Unity in a Gujarat deeply divided

From migrant workers’ distress to farmer protests, the voices of unhappiness over the cost of the Sardar Patel statue—the ‘Statue of Unity’—have found new company in Gujarat

A Statue of Unity in a Gujarat deeply divided

A few weeks ago, as streams of migrants began fleeing Gujarat, engineers at the site of the towering 182-feet tall Statue of Unity of Sardar Patel had to make some quick decisions. Nearly half of the 4,500 workers on site, labouring away to meet a tight deadline, were migrants. They were electricians and fitters and masons. But, in that moment, what mattered was that they happened to be Hindi-speaking men, largely from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
“There were concerns about their safety,” said an official in-charge of the project on condition of anonymity. In the shadow of the world’s tallest statue coming up to symbolize unity—which the Prime Minister Narendra Modi will inaugurate tomorrow—rumour and fear spread due to an atmosphere of disunity.
Work stalled temporarily and a one-day awareness program was hurriedly held. “We visited the labour camps and assured them of safety,” the official quoted above said. Since the prime minister was slated to visit soon, local police stepped in and offered all possible support.
Other migrants in other parts of the state weren’t so lucky. An estimated 80,000 of them fled the state in early October, following the rape of a 14-month-old girl on 28 September, allegedly by a migrant worker. Hate messages urging attacks on migrants went viral on social media. The BJP and Congress blamed each other for fanning the fire. Some of the online messages made no mention of the rape, focusing instead on how migrant workers were taking away job opportunities meant for locals. Companies of special reserve police mobilized around the auto and industrial hub in Sanand-Hansalpur area, a cluster seen as a showcase of the Gujarat development model. About 200km away, in one of the few patches of land in Gujarat where migrants went about their work in relative calm, finishing touches were being done on the Sardar’s face.
For Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, who placed a premium on national unity, and whose call for “common endeavour” prominently adorns the government website about the project, the atmosphere was less than ideal to soar into the skies in statue form.
There had already been enough murmurs of unhappiness due to the price tag on this bronze-sculpted piece of Gujarati pride, an estimated ₹2,900 crore ($430 million)—a large portion of which came from the government and public sector firms which doled out large sums from their CSR budget. The Statue of Liberty in New York, on the other hand, was funded largely through private contributions.

Now, with the date of inauguration looming into view in the very month in which large numbers of fellow Indians fled the state; amidst a farming season that has seen acute water stress in the Narmada catchment, where the statue is also located; and with agitators from Sardar Patel’s own community persisting with a quota protest—the voices of unhappiness about the cost have found new company. A number of tribal villages in the immediate vicinity of the Sardar Patel statue have also called for a bandh on 31 October to protest the lack of adequate rehabilitation efforts.
“At a time when Gujarat is facing a water crisis due to lower availability in the Narmada dam, I think the statue project could have been postponed by a year,” said Ghanshyam Shah, a leading political expert based in Gujarat and author of Social Movements in India. “The statue is nothing but somebody’s whim to create the tallest one in the world so that the name of the person who built it will automatically be attached to it. If the statue does not please the Patels or the tribals, whom does it please?” Shah asked.

If the state government is indeed aware of the many ironies that have come to cast a cloud over the statue’s inauguration, then there has not been much public acknowledgment—a fact which is borne out even by the television ad campaign meant to bring attention to the Statue of Unity project.
In the ad, a youth is shown travelling by train while reading a book titled Patel. It has a picture of India’s first home minister on the cover. He turns to his co-passengers and inquiries about their identities, asking even for their
When the co-passengers ask him to prove his identity first, the youth shows them the book he is carrying and explains how people in India would have needed a passport to travel to different parts of the country had it not been for the efforts of Sardar Patel in creating an undivided India that we see today.
The ads were aired as out-of-state workers were boarding similar looking trains heading out of the state.
The impact on business

“The threat to north Indian migrant workers has affected many projects in the state. Most of the large construction projects depend heavily on migrant workers,” said a leading Gujarat- based industrialist who did not wish to be named.
“Many of them working in our under-construction projects have fled and are likely to return only after Diwali. Such incidents may have happened in Maharashtra or elsewhere, but have never happened in Gujarat. It reflects the failure of the government to take necessary steps to curb violence,” the industrialist added.
Even as chief minister Vijay Rupani appealed for peace, the government has also moved to enact a new law which will mandate industrial units to allocate 80% of the jobs to those domiciled in Gujarat. While Gujarat has an existing industrial policy that reserves 85% of jobs for locals, implementation has been lax. The new law is expected to include more stringent provisions in case of non-compliance. A state government official, when asked if the Statue of Unity adheres to the policy of giving 80% employment to locals, refused to comment on the matter, saying only that the issue would be examined.
While there is no official data on migrant workers, estimate pegs their number at 4-8 million, making them integral to state’s economy, said Indira Hirway, director and professor of economics at the Centre for Development Alternatives (CFDA) in Ahmedabad. “The state has the lowest minimum wages in the country and this helps maximise the profits of organizations and factories,” she said. “Luxurious projects like the Statue of Unity should ideally come up in times of prosperity and not when there is such high level of inequality in society,” she added.
The other prominent group for whom the statue has come to represent a litany of pre-existing grievances is the string of tribal villages in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Govindbhai Tadvi, village head of Wagadia, says that about 1,500 people in his village have lost their land and are yet to be rehabilitated. Tadvi, who works as a supervisor at site, says that the locals have not really benefited. The state government has pinned its hopes on the employment which will be created if the expected 14,000 tourists visit the area each day.

Statue of Unity should come up in times of prosperity and not when there is such high level of inequality in society- Indira Hirway, director, Centre for Development Alternatives in Ahmedabad

But the tribals aren’t buying such long-term promises built on hopes and estimates. About 75,000 people belonging to 70 villages have expressed their intention to oppose the unveiling of the statue by PM Modi by observing a fast today.“No food will be cooked in all these 70 villages and we will put black flags on our houses as a sign of protest,” said Lakhanbhai Musafir, a resident of Mathawadi village that lies about 5 km from the Sardar Patel statue. “We are not against the BJP or Sardar Patel. In fact, we have a lot of respect for Sardar Patel who led a very simple life and I am not sure if he would himself approve of such a grand project,” he added.
Musafir added that the people living near the Sardar Sarovar dam, which is a few kilometres away, are not getting Narmada waters despite the canal passing nearby as the government is yet to finish work on its canal network. According to RTI activist Rohit Prajapati, the government should have spent the money on the welfare of the tribals and in completing the canal network instead of building the statue.

We have a lot of respect for Sardar Patel who led a very simple life and I am not sure if he would himself approve of such a grand project- Lakhanbhai Musafir, a resident of Mathawadi village, about 5km from the Sardar Patel statue

Statue of ironies
“It is a statue of ironies and you can take your pick. They do not want Patel of unity but Patel of uniformity,” said noted sociologist Shiv Visvanathan. “The bigger the statue, the bigger the lie, and that’s how I see it. Given the displacement of tribals in the area, it is more of a displacer than a unifier. Appropriating history in the age of propaganda is not new, but our memories go far back and cannot be displaced so quickly,” he added.Sardar Patel was a member of the Congress, but is a new-found hero for the BJP, which contrasts his iron man qualities with the perceived weaknesses of Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister. Modi has, on several occasions, said how Patel had repeatedly been ignored by the Congress and was not allowed to become India’s first prime minister. But the attempts to own or re-own the legacy of one of India’s most-noted leaders from the Patel community have to also grapple with the present-day ongoing agitations for a quota in higher education and government jobs. The movement’s spearhead Hardik Patel has been at loggerheads with ruling BJP governments in both the state and the centre.
With the government in no mood to accede to their demands, the Patels have also threatened an agitation on 31 October, the birth anniversary of Sardar Patel. Hardik Patel is expected to address a rally in Junagadh district, which is likely to feature former finance minister Yashwant Sinha and BJP MP Shatrughan Sinha.In the face of this unending fight for a piece of Sardar Patel’s legacy by a variety of groups—ranging from castes and states to political parties—noted historian and biographer Ramchandra Guha, said: “All I would like to say is that in the words of Gopalkrishna Gandhi, the Congress ‘disowned’ Patel, whereupon the BJP ‘misowned’ him.”
Meanwhile, work at the Statue of Unity itself has progressed almost in a vacuum, unaffected by the many agitations. After all, it was conceived, in part, to symbolize the development vision and speed of execution of the ‘Gujarat model’ of development which Modi popularized.
For Mohammad Miyan, a 25-year-old electrician from Bihar who has been working on the Sardar Patel statue and the associated museum, the “stories of how people like me were treated” was just stories.
“Our contractor assured our safety. There are about 25 other workers from my village alone here,” he said. Miyan’s worksite colleague, Sandeep Kumar Gord, who is also from Bihar, was taking measurements, checking whether the statue was balanced. “I have only heard that PM Narendra Modi is making this statue. I do not know anything beyond that,” he said

Demand for Ordinance on Ram Temple Gets Louder as SC Adjourns Ayodhya Dispute Cases to 2019

The demands to take the ordinance route were spurred by the Supreme Court decision that the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute cases will not be taken up now, but in January.

Demand for Ordinance on Ram Temple Gets Louder as SC Adjourns Ayodhya Dispute Cases to 2019

The demand for the Narendra Modi government to take the ordinance route to facilitate early construction of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya grew louder on Monday as several BJP leaders and Sangh outfits voiced their frustration with the judicial process “getting delayed”.

The demands were spurred by the Supreme Court deciding that the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute cases will not be taken up now, but in January, after just a four-minute hearing. “We have other priorities,” a bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said.
Within hours of the court hearing ending, BJP leaders like Sanjeev Baliyan and Vinay Katiyar, and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the ideological parent of the BJP, pushed for an ordinance to fast-forward the temple construction.

Union minister Giriraj Singh sounded an ominous warning, saying he feared the consequences if there was a further delay in building the temple.

“Ab Hinduon ka sabr toot raha hai. Mujhe bhay hai ki Hinduon ka sabr tuta toh kya hoga (Hindus are losing patience now. I am afraid of what would follow),” the Minister of State for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises said, adding that the court was not needed to solve the dispute.
BJP leader Vinay Katiyar alleged that the issue was being delayed "under pressure" from the Congress, which denied the charge. “People like Kapil Sibal and Prashant Bhushan are pressing for delaying the issue. Till when will Ram bhakts (devotees) wait? In 2019, the Congress will come to know," he said. His party colleague Sanjeev Baliyan said, "I am surprised at the priorities of the court. I am of the view that the Ram Temple should be constructed. The government should explore all possibilities."

Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut said the Ram temple was an issue of faith and demanded that the government come out with an ordinance soon. "It is a matter of faith. The court cannot decide on this. The government should bring an ordinance," he said.

The pressure on the BJP to bring an ordinance has grown ever since RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, in his annual Vijayadashmi address, asked the government to bring a law too.
The RSS, on Monday too, pressed for the construction of a Ram temple, saying it would lead to an atmosphere of "goodwill and harmony" in the country. "The RSS is of the opinion that a Ram temple should be constructed at the disputed site. The Supreme Court should immediately decide the case. If there are problems, the Centre should bring a legislation to remove the obstacles and hand over the Ram Janamsthan bhoomi to the Shri Ramjanmabhoomi Nyas," Arun Kumar, the Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh of the Sangh, said.

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, however, said it was a familiar story every five years before the elections when the BJP tries to polarise the issue. "The Congress's stated position is that the matter is before the Supreme Court and everyone should wait until the Supreme Court decides... We should not jump the gun," he told reporters.
To a question on possibility of an ordinance for construction of the temple, he said the ordinance has to be decided by the government and not by Parliament. "If someone asks for an ordinance, the Prime Minister has to respond to them, but as you know, he will not respond to any issue," he said.

Another Congress leader Anand Sharma said, "Everyone should patiently wait for the Supreme Court verdict. Congress party has stated that it will welcome and accept the Supreme Court verdict." He said religion is a matter of faith and linking this issue to the vote bank politics will be a disservice to the nation.

All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul Muslimeen (AIMIM) leader Asaddudin Owaisi dared the government to bring an ordinance, saying the BJP refers to the Ram Temple again and again. "If they have the courage, they should bring an Ordinance on Ram Temple construction. They are trying to scare us about bringing an Ordinance, why don't they bring it," he said.
Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) working president Alok Kumar said Hindus cannot wait eternally for a court judgment on the Ayodhya land dispute case and asked the government to bring a law for building a Ram temple. He urged the Narendra Modi government to bring a legislation in the Winter Session of Parliament.

"The Supreme Court has once again adjourned the hearing. This fortifies the VHP's stand that the solution to the Ram Janambhoomi issue is not in eternally waiting for hearing of appeals pending for over seven years. 
"We reiterate our request to the Union government to enact a law to clear the way for building a grand temple of Lord Ram at his birthplace in Ayodhya," Kumar said.

On allegations by some BJP leaders that the delay was under pressure from some Congress leaders, Chidambaram said, "The Supreme Court will decide when to hear the case. We don't decide when the court will hear the case."

A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, said the appropriate bench will decide the future course of hearing in January next year on the appeals filed against the Allahabad High Court verdict in the Ayodhya land dispute case. "We will fix the date of hearing of the Ayodhya dispute case before the appropriate bench in January," said the bench, which also comprised Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph.  
 

 

This SC has done very well to help thrust this Ayodhya conclusion to help future season

This SC has done very well to help thrust this Ayodhya conclusion to help future season

The Supreme Court has done well to push hearing the Ram case to January, effectively ensuring that a verdict on the case’t come before the next parliamentary elections, which are likely to happen across April and May. The court’s logic is that the dispute is a civil one, over land, and that there is no urgency in hearing the case. In truth, the dispute transcends domains and could have a huge implication on the elections. A pro- verdict would have the Party (BJP), and its affiliates and supporters. An verdict would have given them an opportunity to the electorate. Both may have affected the verdict of what is promising to be a very interesting election. In that aspect, the delay is an entirely reasonable trade-off.

Both the BJP and its ideological parent, the (RSS), were optimistic about a verdict on the decades-long dispute coming out this year. The initial thinking was that this would happen under the previous chief justice of India,, who retired in early October. Later, with the hearing expected to begin on October 29, the thinking changed to a verdict being delivered in four to five months. That is not to be. The court will now start hearing the case only in January; even a bench’t been constituted. It is safe to say that a verdict can be expected only after the next government has been sworn in. The court’s decision breaks the momentum that seemed to be building up. Over the past few months, the temple issue has come to the fore again. Last week, this newspaper reported a meeting in Lucknow attended by senior BJP leaders and representatives of around 40 RSS affiliates on political strategy. One of the things discussed at the meeting was to leverage the Ram and the upcoming at Allahabad. Even Shiv Sena leader, Thackeray, said he would make a trip to in relation to the temple.
The RSS has already responded to the court’s decision, repeating its earlier demand, asking the government to legislate a law that allows for a Ram temple to be built at the disputed site at. There has also been some noise about the need for an ordinance. The government’s initial response to the court’s decision has been cautious but clear: that it’t want to comment on what the court has done but that it would have been good to resolve the festering dispute at the earliest. It’t clear whether the government will listen to demands for a legislation or an ordinance. Either would bring Parliament to a standstill.