Google 20th Birthday: Built by two friends, the Internet's largest search engine, know how happened.

Today is the 20th birthday of Google's largest search engine Google (Google 20th Birthday). On the 20th birthday, Google has written G20GLE

Today is the 20th birthday of Google's largest search engine Google (Google 20th Birthday). On the 20th birthday, Google has written G20GLE Also Google has shown the video. Where he is showing the whole journey of Google. The video shows searches in many languages. Google started with two students. There was a college project that we know today as Google. Larry Page and Sergey Bin were doing PhD at Stanford University in 1995. He created an internet search engine on Google.stanford.edu address. Firstly its name was BackRub. After which it was named GOOGLE

The domain of Google.com (google.com) though registered on September 15, 1995. That's why Google's birthday should be on September 15. However, Larry Page and Sergey Bin, the founder of search engine, registered Google as a company on September 4, 1998, and opened the first bank account on the company name. In this sense, Google's birthday can be celebrated on September 4.

Google has so far celebrated its birthday on four separate dates. On Google's 15th birthday, the company himself admitted that he did not know when Google was the real birthday. Google has celebrated its birthday on September 7, September 8, September 26 and September 27 in different years. In 2002, Google celebrated its fourth birthday on 27 September. Google celebrated its birthday on September 7 and next September 8 next year. However, since the year 2006 Google has been celebrating its birthday only on 27th September.

On the occasion of International Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, Dr. Anup Kumar, in JMI, informed that the way of prevention and treatment

Head of Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, Prof., in Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi. Dr. Anoop Kumar cautioned that in the case of the number of patients in the world in this disease, India is second only.

During a campaign organized in Jamia Milia Islamia on International Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, the world renowned specialist of this topic and Head of Department of Urology and Renal Trapplant in Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, Prof. Dr. Anoop Kumar cautioned that India is second number in case of the number of patients in the world, but timely treatment and balanced eating habits are easy to control. He said that there is no need to be afraid of prostate cancer because 90 percent of its patients can be cured without surgery.

Dr. Anoop said, it is a myth that prostate cancer is a disease of the western countries and it is not generally in India. Indeed, after western countries, the number of such patients is highest in our country's men. He said that by changing lifestyle and eating habits, this disease can easily be avoided. At the same time, he advised that after the age of 50, "PSA" should be done once in a test year. It can be easily rested on time with this disease. He said that in the families whose cases of prostate cancer has been found, the chances of this disease increase by nine percent of their families.

Members of such families should take more precautions. To avoid this disease, they advised to discipline lifestyle, cigarettes, avoiding alcohol, eating non-veg less, drinking excess water, canned mines and more than two or three foods in the fridge. A large number of JMI students and teachers came to hear their lecture. Dr. Ershad Naqvi, CMO, Dr. Ansari Health Center, Jamia, appreciated the efforts of Dr Anoop in presenting the common causes of this disease and preserving and treating it.

JMI Registrar A. P. Siddiqui: IPS: Thanking Dr. Anoop, he said that by learning from the information given to him, we should make changes in our lifestyles which ease the disease. This public lecture was organized by the Joint Contact Officer-Media Coordinator of JMI, jointly with the Center of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Dental and Ansari Health Center.

Because the property is not feminine

Supreme court first gave way to gender equality by giving women the right to family property and now has unleashed the 158-year-old law and opened its way to sexual freedom.

The Supreme Court's verdict of cancellation of the adultery law is not so much that the extramarital affairs of women and men will no longer be regarded as criminal. Unfortunately in our continuous surface-time, most people will explain this decision so thoroughly. This decision of our society, which is constantly becoming a joke, can take an opportunity for some sneaking on the openness of man-woman relations, but it is a historic decision.

Because the decision of this verdict is also with the freedom of woman and its sexual freedom. The Supreme Court has probably outlined so clearly for the first time that the body is the property of the woman and she has the right to decide about it. Although the mention of sexual independence of a woman, some people are sprayed like this, such as those who are engaged in discussions or demanding sexual freedom for women seeking a license for extramarital affairs or advocating disorder of sexual relationships.

While the case is simply that the man is also free as a man, the marriage is bound to make him social and moral bond, but both have an autonomous personality. Earlier, this autonomy was achieved only by a man. Not only now, but in the past the prostitution of married men was also socially accepted, but in the landlords who used to avoid this, men used to question their masculinity.

The Supreme Court has actually shocked the concept of this masculinity. Because, under this concept, the man is considered to be his property. Whether she wants to stay in the house, if she wants to go to the office - she will enjoy the freedom she has given and will be grateful for her. Priyanka Chopra does not want a child in the film 'Dil Dhadkana Do', which she got married a few days ago, she wants to be separated from that marriage - she does not understand this decision - her parents and not even her. Prior to this, Priyanka Chopra's husband Rahul Bose tells very badly that she has given full freedom to work for Priyanka. On this, Priyanka's friend, Farhan Akhtar, raises the question that he needs your order for his independence.

To say this means that the Supreme Court has been debating beforehand on many forms of feminism. On the two fronts of sexual equality and sexual independence, the woman has been struggling constantly and due to which she is constantly chasing, she gradually appears to win. Supreme court first gave way to gender equality by giving women the right to family property and now has unleashed the 158-year-old law and opened its way to sexual freedom.

But despite all these legal and constitutional arrangements, does the woman have the status of equal status in any form or her independence? There is no doubt that he has got many exemptions compared to earlier- his presence in education, in jobs, sports and in all areas has increased and acceptance also. Government advertisements show this gender equality of equality, it may not be true, but in our public life both woman's status and status has increased.

Asia Cup 2018: This tweet made by Shahid Afridi and Shoaib Akhtar, unhappy with the Pakistan team's defeat ...

The defeat of the Pakistan team, led by Sarfraj Ahmed, has also brought great disappointment to the cricket fans who had hoped to get the final of the tournament between the traditional rival India and Pakistan. The performance of the Pakistan team in the entire tournament was very weak and the team against India had to face defeat by a big difference in both the matches.

Pakistan's cricket team in Asia Cup 2018 could not reach the final. The Pakistani team suffered a 37-run loss to Bangladesh in the Super-4 match here yesterday, and the dream of reaching the finals of the team was shattered. The defeat of the Pakistan team led by Sarfraj Ahmed has also led to deep disappointment to those cricket lovers who had hoped to get the final of the tournament between the traditional rival India and Pakistan. The performance of the Pakistan team in the entire tournament was very weak and the team against India had to face defeat by a big difference in both the matches.

Former Pakistan players Shahid Afridi and Shoaib Akhtar have expressed regret for not reaching the final of the Pakistan team. However, both of them admitted that the performance of the Pakistan team was extremely low and the players could not meet the expectations. Afridi wrote in his tweet after the defeat of the Pakistan team, "Congratulations Bangladesh. I am extremely disappointed with the overall performance of the Pakistan team. It saw a lack of aggressive ability in all areas of the game of cricket. This is a young team which has done well in the last tournament. The team needs to pay more attention to the practice for a strong return. Earlier, Afridi had given a tweet to the Pakistan team by tweeting before the Super-4 match against Bangladesh. He said that for the respectable score of the Pakistan team, there will be a good batting for the injured Zaas. It is a different thing that even before the fierce match was out in the over and Shahid Afridi's hopes were not fulfilled

Former Pakistan fast bowler Shoaib Akhtar also described the team's performance disappointing. Popularly known as 'Rawalpindi Express', Shoaib tweeted, "It is very regrettable to see the Pakistan team shatter like this. I hope the team management, selectors and players will work well together before the next series. Still standing in support of the Pakistan team. '

Bigg Boss 12: 'Mastermind' Vikas Gupta, who arrived with the mirror of truth in Bigg Boss house, warned Sreesanth ?

Bigg Boss 12: 'Mastermind' Vikas Gupta, who arrived with the mirror of truth in

 Bigg Boss house, warned Sreesanth

The former Contestant Vikas Gupta, who was called last year's mastermind player, to make a little more interaction with Bigg Boss 12 (Bigg Boss 12) is going to get entry in the house. Vikas Gupta had reached the finale of Big Boss Season 11 due to his vicious game. Now he will go to the house members by taking the true mirror and so far the reality of events in the Big Boss house will be turned to the truth. Vikas Gupta will see all the members present in the house giving proper suggestions. He told Sreesanth that instead of running away or staying away from the task, you have to work from home in the brain, otherwise you will get acquainted.

Not only this, Vikas was very happy with Urvashi Vani's play, because he brought out the truth of Somaee Khan. In today's episode of 'Bigg Boss 12', 'Jasleen Matharoo' will come near Anup Jalota and they will very much love their cheeks and then kiss their forehead. Anoop Jalota will also pinch it and say that he is not going to wash these marks. Everyone laughs at this thing at home, and becomes emotional after seeing their love.

Not only this, in the episode yesterday Anup Jalota had become quite romantic even during the conversation. He was talking to the members of the house, he told Jasleen that on Diwali, what else do we need for anything else, you yourself have cracked. Jasleen was very laughing at this. Anyway, Anoop Jalota and Jasleen Matharoo pair are doing quite a bit in 'Bigg Boss 12'. However, during the Task, Jasleen had accepted defeat very early.

IPC 497? Supreme Court finishes 158-year-old adultery laws ?

In the Supreme Court, the Constitution Bench of five judges, on Thursday, declared the verdict of the Indian Condemning Code of Conduct (IPC) on 497, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Deepak Mishra said, "This crime should not be done."

In the Supreme Court, the Constitution Bench of five judges, on Thursday, deciding the verdict of the Indian Condemning Code of Conduct (IPC) on 497, the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Deepak Mishra said, "This crime is not going to happen needed." The Supreme Court has canceled the 158-year-old anti-incarnation law and said that there is no crime in the adultery. The court said that there is no doubt that it can be the basis of divorce, but this law affects the right of women to live. The court said that the husband is not the owner of the woman and whatever arrangement contrasts or discriminated against the dignity of the woman, she invites the wrath of the Constitution. The provision that treats women with disabilities is unconstitutional. The court said that this law disrespects woman's desire and sexual challenge. The Chief Justice said that if a spouse becomes selfish because of adultery, and if this is proven in court then a case of suicidal tenderness will prevail. The court said that men are always seductive, women are always victims - this is not the case anymore.

The Supreme Court canceled the adultery law, the Constitution Bench said: "This is not a crime


What is section 497
Under Section 497 of the IPC, if a married man makes a relationship with another married woman, then this is a crime. But there is no crime against a married woman. The most important thing in this section is that the married woman's husband can not even register a case against his wife. In this case, the complainant, the wife of a man who has a relationship with a married woman, can file a complaint.

Under this law, if convicted, the culprit can be punished for a maximum of five years. Complaint is not made in any police station but the complaint is made by the magistrate and the evidence is presented to the court.

 The central government supported the Section 497 of the IPC. The central government said that the Supreme Court also said that Jarata is a threat to the marriage institute and it also affects the families.
- On behalf of the Central Government, ASG Pinky Annad had said that the law should look into the development and change in its society, not from the perspective of Western society.

Ayodhya case: Is Namaz an integral part of Islam in the mosque? Supreme Court decides today, 10 important things ?

Today the Supreme Court will pronounce a crucial verdict on the Ram Janmabhoomi-a case related to the Ayodhya case (Namaz at Mosque is integral to Islam) today.

Today, the Supreme Court will announce a major decision on a matter related to the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute. Ram Janmabhoomi - The Babri Masjid is likely to pronounce its verdict on the Supreme Court's plea today on the plea of ​​a Muslim group seeking a rethink on the Supreme Court's 1994 decision on the ownership of the Babri Masjid. The Supreme Court will decide whether the decision of the Constitution Bench of 1994 needs to be reconsidered or not? In fact, in the 1994 judgment, it was said that Namaz is not an integral part of Islam in the mosque.

    If the bench of the three judges decides that the matter should be reconsidered, then it can send the Constitution bench of five judges. This will delay the hearing of the title suit. On the other hand, if the bench says that there is no need to consider that decision, then the hearing on the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute can be soon.

    On July 20, the Supreme Court reserved the judgment on whether or not there needs to be considered again on the 1994 judgment of Constitution Bench.

    Actually, before the Supreme Court Title Suit, now he was hearing on this aspect that whether prayer is an integral part of Islam in the mosque. It was decided before the court that it will be decided that the decision of the Constitution bench of 1994 needs to be re-considered or not that reading Namaz in the mosque is not an integral part of Islam. After this the title suit will be considered.

    In fact, in 1994, the bench of five judges had instructed to maintain status quo in the Ram Janmabhoomi so that Hindu worship can be done. The bench also said that reading Namaz in the mosque is not an integral part of Islam. In 2010, the Allahabad High Court gave a third Hindus, one-third of the Muslims and one-third to Ram Lala.

    While debating on behalf of the Muslim side, Rajiv Dhawan, giving examples of breaking the statue of Buddha by the Taliban, said that he has no hesitation in saying that the mosque which was dropped in 1992 was dropped by the Hindu Talibanis. Accusing the UP government on behalf of the Muslim side, the government said that the government had to have a role to play in this matter, but they broke it.

    The bench of Chief Justice Deepak Mishra and Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S Abdul Nazir will pronounce their verdict. The bench had reserved it on July 20.

    A native of the Ayodhya case, M Siddique, had objected to these specific findings in the 1994 judgment of M Ismail Farooqi, which stated that the mosque is not an integral part of the prayers to be paid by followers of Islam. Siddiq is dead and his representation is his legal heir.

    The Muslim groups have argued before the bench headed by Chief Justice that in this judgment, the review of the Supreme Court needs to be re-considered by a five-member bench because it will affect the Babri Masjid-Ram temple land dispute case.

    The Uttar Pradesh government had told the apex court that some Muslim groups demanding reconsideration of the 1994 remarks regarding 'an integral part of Islam is not due to the mosque', the long pending Ayodhya temple - trying to delay the mosque land dispute case Are there. Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the deputy government, had said that this dispute is waiting for a final decision from nearly a century.

    Senior advocate Rajiv Dhawan, appearing on behalf of Siddiqui legal representative, had said that the mosques are not an integral part of Islam, the remarks were made by the Supreme Court without considering any investigation or religious books.

Kim want peace, but continue the pamphins: Donald Trump ?

The US president said that Kim Jong got an opportunity to know them and I like that.

US President Donald Trump praised North Korea's leader Kim Jong, but on Wednesday called for the strict sanctions on the country. Presiding over a special session of the United Nations Security Council on Nuclear Disarmament, Trump said that in the coming months and years, he is expected to receive "very good news" from North Korea, because he was the leader of the North Korean leader in Singapore Had met The US president said that Kim Jong got an opportunity to know them and I like that.

He wants peace and prosperity for North Korea. He said that things are getting away from the eyes of the media, which nobody knows and they are getting in very positive way. But Trump, in the response to North Korea's nuclear and missile tests, has been sanctioned by the Security Council over the years. Called for execution. Trump, while reading the pre-written speech on paper, said that till the nuclear disarmament has been done, we should continue to implement the current UN Security Council proposals.

Raiding the RJD MLA's close proximity to Laloo Prasad Yadav, the Income Tax Department raided?

Dajana Dajana, the RJD legislator from Surasand Bihar Assembly constituency of Sitamarhi district, is whose same company was making a mall on the land of Lalu Yadav.

The Income Tax Department raided the house of party MLA and former legislator Laloo Prasad Yadav's confidante Syed Abu Dowana's house in the plot case instead of the railway hotel tender. The raids were carried out on several premises in Patna in Dona, Iowa. Income Tax Department sources said that three assets owned by Syed Abu Dujana, two of which are in Patna city and third in Danapur, were taken into custody by several teams from the Income Tax Department, Delhi. Take care that the RJD legislator Dojana Dosana is the same from Surasand Bihar assembly seat of Sitamarhi district whose company was making a mall on the land of Lalu Yadav.

It is worth mentioning that Bihar Deputy Chief Minister and senior BJP leader Sushil Kumar Modi had disclosed the construction of the said mall in the nearly three acres of land at a cost of Rs 750 crores, after which the ED had sealed it. During the raids, Sushil tweeted that Shahabuddin, Rajbalabh and Ratilal Yadav from Abu Dowana had dozens of tainted backgrounds. Representatives for themselves fresh instructions from the Supreme Court to Lalu Prasad to criminalize political blow.

Sushil Modi said that now Rabri Devi, wife of Lalu Prasad, and the two sons will be able to tell the stunning and brightest Pratapap Yadav, what are the cases going on against them. He said that the Supreme Court's directive will prove to be a cleanliness campaign of politics. Meanwhile, RJD spokesman and legislator, Agya Yadav, expressed deep dissatisfaction with the raids by the Income Tax Department, alleging that it was another desperate to harass and ruin Lalu Prasad at the behest of BJP and JDU's national president and Chief Minister Nitish Kumar. There is a full effort.

After all, the UN honored PM Modi with respect ...

The world's six most outstanding environmental converters have been honored with the United Nations' highest environmental honor, Champions of the Earth Award.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been honored with the highest honor of the United Nations on the leadership of the International Solar Coalition and the resolution to free India from a single-use plastic by 2022. This honor has been given to five other persons and organizations. The world's six most outstanding environmental converters have been honored with the United Nations' highest environmental honor, Champions of the Earth Award.

According to the United Nations Environment Program, this year's award winners are being honored for courageous, innovative and untiring efforts to deal with some of the most urgent environmental issues of today's time. In the category of policy leadership, French President Manuel Macro and Modi have been jointly selected for this honor.

Ram Janmabhoomi - The Supreme Court's decision on the Babri Masjid dispute on Thursday?

The Supreme Court will decide that the decisions of the Constitution Bench of 1994, namaz is not an integral part of Islam in the mosque, but needs to be reconsidered or not.

Ram Janmabhoomi - The Supreme Court will pronounce a crucial verdict on Thursday on the Babri Masjid dispute. The Supreme Court will decide whether the decision of the Constitution Bench of 1994 needs reconsideration or not. It was said in the verse that namaz is not an integral part of Islam in the mosque.

If the bench of three judges decides that reconsideration should be done then it can send the matter to the constitution bench of five judges. This will delay the hearing of the title suit. If the bench says that there is no need to consider the decision, then the Ram Janmabhoomi - Babri Masjid land dispute can be heard soon.

On July 20, the Supreme Court reserved the judgment on whether or not there needs to be considered again on the 1994 judgment of Constitution Bench.

Actually, before the Supreme Court Title Suit, he was now hearing on the aspect that praying in the mosque is an integral part of Islam or not. The court had said that earlier it would be decided that the decision of the Constitution bench of 1994 needs to be re-considered or not that praying in the mosque is not an integral part of Islam. After this the title suit will be considered.

 

In the year 1994, the bench of five judges had instructed to maintain status quo in the Ram Janmabhoomi so that Hindu worship can be done. The bench also said that reading Namaz in the mosque is not an integral part of Islam. In 2010, Allahabad High Court gave the judgment, one third of the land was given to Hindus, one-third of Muslims and one third to Ram Lala.