Ayodhya case: Is Namaz an integral part of Islam in the mosque? Supreme Court decides today, 10 important things ?

Today the Supreme Court will pronounce a crucial verdict on the Ram Janmabhoomi-a case related to the Ayodhya case (Namaz at Mosque is integral to Islam) today.

Today, the Supreme Court will announce a major decision on a matter related to the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute. Ram Janmabhoomi - The Babri Masjid is likely to pronounce its verdict on the Supreme Court's plea today on the plea of ​​a Muslim group seeking a rethink on the Supreme Court's 1994 decision on the ownership of the Babri Masjid. The Supreme Court will decide whether the decision of the Constitution Bench of 1994 needs to be reconsidered or not? In fact, in the 1994 judgment, it was said that Namaz is not an integral part of Islam in the mosque.

    If the bench of the three judges decides that the matter should be reconsidered, then it can send the Constitution bench of five judges. This will delay the hearing of the title suit. On the other hand, if the bench says that there is no need to consider that decision, then the hearing on the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute can be soon.

    On July 20, the Supreme Court reserved the judgment on whether or not there needs to be considered again on the 1994 judgment of Constitution Bench.

    Actually, before the Supreme Court Title Suit, now he was hearing on this aspect that whether prayer is an integral part of Islam in the mosque. It was decided before the court that it will be decided that the decision of the Constitution bench of 1994 needs to be re-considered or not that reading Namaz in the mosque is not an integral part of Islam. After this the title suit will be considered.

    In fact, in 1994, the bench of five judges had instructed to maintain status quo in the Ram Janmabhoomi so that Hindu worship can be done. The bench also said that reading Namaz in the mosque is not an integral part of Islam. In 2010, the Allahabad High Court gave a third Hindus, one-third of the Muslims and one-third to Ram Lala.

    While debating on behalf of the Muslim side, Rajiv Dhawan, giving examples of breaking the statue of Buddha by the Taliban, said that he has no hesitation in saying that the mosque which was dropped in 1992 was dropped by the Hindu Talibanis. Accusing the UP government on behalf of the Muslim side, the government said that the government had to have a role to play in this matter, but they broke it.

    The bench of Chief Justice Deepak Mishra and Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S Abdul Nazir will pronounce their verdict. The bench had reserved it on July 20.

    A native of the Ayodhya case, M Siddique, had objected to these specific findings in the 1994 judgment of M Ismail Farooqi, which stated that the mosque is not an integral part of the prayers to be paid by followers of Islam. Siddiq is dead and his representation is his legal heir.

    The Muslim groups have argued before the bench headed by Chief Justice that in this judgment, the review of the Supreme Court needs to be re-considered by a five-member bench because it will affect the Babri Masjid-Ram temple land dispute case.

    The Uttar Pradesh government had told the apex court that some Muslim groups demanding reconsideration of the 1994 remarks regarding 'an integral part of Islam is not due to the mosque', the long pending Ayodhya temple - trying to delay the mosque land dispute case Are there. Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the deputy government, had said that this dispute is waiting for a final decision from nearly a century.

    Senior advocate Rajiv Dhawan, appearing on behalf of Siddiqui legal representative, had said that the mosques are not an integral part of Islam, the remarks were made by the Supreme Court without considering any investigation or religious books.

Kim want peace, but continue the pamphins: Donald Trump ?

The US president said that Kim Jong got an opportunity to know them and I like that.

US President Donald Trump praised North Korea's leader Kim Jong, but on Wednesday called for the strict sanctions on the country. Presiding over a special session of the United Nations Security Council on Nuclear Disarmament, Trump said that in the coming months and years, he is expected to receive "very good news" from North Korea, because he was the leader of the North Korean leader in Singapore Had met The US president said that Kim Jong got an opportunity to know them and I like that.

He wants peace and prosperity for North Korea. He said that things are getting away from the eyes of the media, which nobody knows and they are getting in very positive way. But Trump, in the response to North Korea's nuclear and missile tests, has been sanctioned by the Security Council over the years. Called for execution. Trump, while reading the pre-written speech on paper, said that till the nuclear disarmament has been done, we should continue to implement the current UN Security Council proposals.

Raiding the RJD MLA's close proximity to Laloo Prasad Yadav, the Income Tax Department raided?

Dajana Dajana, the RJD legislator from Surasand Bihar Assembly constituency of Sitamarhi district, is whose same company was making a mall on the land of Lalu Yadav.

The Income Tax Department raided the house of party MLA and former legislator Laloo Prasad Yadav's confidante Syed Abu Dowana's house in the plot case instead of the railway hotel tender. The raids were carried out on several premises in Patna in Dona, Iowa. Income Tax Department sources said that three assets owned by Syed Abu Dujana, two of which are in Patna city and third in Danapur, were taken into custody by several teams from the Income Tax Department, Delhi. Take care that the RJD legislator Dojana Dosana is the same from Surasand Bihar assembly seat of Sitamarhi district whose company was making a mall on the land of Lalu Yadav.

It is worth mentioning that Bihar Deputy Chief Minister and senior BJP leader Sushil Kumar Modi had disclosed the construction of the said mall in the nearly three acres of land at a cost of Rs 750 crores, after which the ED had sealed it. During the raids, Sushil tweeted that Shahabuddin, Rajbalabh and Ratilal Yadav from Abu Dowana had dozens of tainted backgrounds. Representatives for themselves fresh instructions from the Supreme Court to Lalu Prasad to criminalize political blow.

Sushil Modi said that now Rabri Devi, wife of Lalu Prasad, and the two sons will be able to tell the stunning and brightest Pratapap Yadav, what are the cases going on against them. He said that the Supreme Court's directive will prove to be a cleanliness campaign of politics. Meanwhile, RJD spokesman and legislator, Agya Yadav, expressed deep dissatisfaction with the raids by the Income Tax Department, alleging that it was another desperate to harass and ruin Lalu Prasad at the behest of BJP and JDU's national president and Chief Minister Nitish Kumar. There is a full effort.

After all, the UN honored PM Modi with respect ...

The world's six most outstanding environmental converters have been honored with the United Nations' highest environmental honor, Champions of the Earth Award.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been honored with the highest honor of the United Nations on the leadership of the International Solar Coalition and the resolution to free India from a single-use plastic by 2022. This honor has been given to five other persons and organizations. The world's six most outstanding environmental converters have been honored with the United Nations' highest environmental honor, Champions of the Earth Award.

According to the United Nations Environment Program, this year's award winners are being honored for courageous, innovative and untiring efforts to deal with some of the most urgent environmental issues of today's time. In the category of policy leadership, French President Manuel Macro and Modi have been jointly selected for this honor.

Ram Janmabhoomi - The Supreme Court's decision on the Babri Masjid dispute on Thursday?

The Supreme Court will decide that the decisions of the Constitution Bench of 1994, namaz is not an integral part of Islam in the mosque, but needs to be reconsidered or not.

Ram Janmabhoomi - The Supreme Court will pronounce a crucial verdict on Thursday on the Babri Masjid dispute. The Supreme Court will decide whether the decision of the Constitution Bench of 1994 needs reconsideration or not. It was said in the verse that namaz is not an integral part of Islam in the mosque.

If the bench of three judges decides that reconsideration should be done then it can send the matter to the constitution bench of five judges. This will delay the hearing of the title suit. If the bench says that there is no need to consider the decision, then the Ram Janmabhoomi - Babri Masjid land dispute can be heard soon.

On July 20, the Supreme Court reserved the judgment on whether or not there needs to be considered again on the 1994 judgment of Constitution Bench.

Actually, before the Supreme Court Title Suit, he was now hearing on the aspect that praying in the mosque is an integral part of Islam or not. The court had said that earlier it would be decided that the decision of the Constitution bench of 1994 needs to be re-considered or not that praying in the mosque is not an integral part of Islam. After this the title suit will be considered.

 

In the year 1994, the bench of five judges had instructed to maintain status quo in the Ram Janmabhoomi so that Hindu worship can be done. The bench also said that reading Namaz in the mosque is not an integral part of Islam. In 2010, Allahabad High Court gave the judgment, one third of the land was given to Hindus, one-third of Muslims and one third to Ram Lala.

Unhappy Paramilitary Forces retirees retire by Rahul Gandhi?

Regarding many demands like Retired Youth One Rank One Pension, from September 28 to September 30, Delhi will perform a demonstration on Jantar Mantar

Unfollowed by the government, retired jawans of Paramltra Force have taken the support of Rahul Gandhi. These jawans who have left the government from the present government will be holding a demonstration on Jantar Mantar from Delhi from September 28 to September 30. Under the strategy to pressure the government, retired soldiers have invited Rahul Gandhi to join his movement.

For many demands like retired young one rank one pension of paramilitary forces of the country, from September 28 to September 30, Delhi will perform a demonstration on Jantar Mantar. According to these soldiers, the way the government is giving the one rank one pension or OOP to the soldiers, the same kind of facilities should be provided to the paramilitary forces jawans also. The family members of these jawans neither get healthcare nor have the martyr's status on giving life to the country.

If they believe that they are carrying out equal responsibility of the army against the terrorists and the Maoists from this border, then why should they be kept free in terms of facilities? The common complaint of these retired soldiers is that whenever and wherever in the country, there is a need of personnel of paramilitary forces on the spot, but when the matter is to be given convenience and respect, then they are ignored. Neither do they get money like army soldiers nor pension.

Each year, hundreds of soldiers lose their lives fighting a Maoist and terrorists inside the country. ITBP jawans are stationed on the border with China at an altitude of 18 thousand feet, while the BSF jawans are stationed on the border with Pakistan in 45 degrees.

Ranvir Singh, general secretary of the Confederation of Paramountry Forces Welfare Association, says that many times before, we have given a memorandum about his demands to the Central Government but so far the attitude of the government has remained neutral, which is why we are forced to perform. Have had to be

There are about 12 lakh services in the country and more than eight lakh retired paramilitary personnel. They say that if our demand is not met then our movement will be swift.

Supreme Court's verdict on the basis of: Kapil Sibal said - This big victory, if needed and then go to court ?

Congress leader Kapil Sibal said after the Supreme Court's verdict on the basis that we have been saying beforehand that the Aadhaar Bill has not been brought to the Rajya Sabha but has been brought here. ?

Congress leader Kapil Sibal said after the Supreme Court's verdict on the basis that we have been saying beforehand that the Aadhaar Bill has not been brought to the Rajya Sabha but has been brought here. This Aadhar card was not the basis of the official rights card and the private companies' rights Act, which was rejected by the Supreme Court. He said that private companies have private information of millions of people. It will be misused. This is unconstitutional. Now the Supreme Court has accepted our case. Section 57 has been termed as unconstitutional by the court. This is a big victory, because in the future the government can not be judged. Kapil Sibal said that the Speaker of the Lok Sabha will be able to hear a bill if money bill is billed. If the government wants to amend, we will go back to the Supreme Court. We are with Justice Chandrachud. This is not a money bill.

Kapil Sibal said that the court has categorically corrected this law in the light of the poor people, but when the amendment, we will go to the Supreme Court again and demand the hearing for the 7 Judge Benches. It is not clear if the working people whose biometric details have been erased, what will the government do for them? We will study the decisions. If necessary, we will again go to court for this. The court also said that it can not keep up to 6 months of data. It is not clear how it will be eliminated. Sibal said that now there will be amendment in the Data Protection Law. Therefore, we want this to be discussed in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. If the base is dropped, then the marginalized people can not get anything. That's why the court is the right decision. We will put pressure on the government for amendment.